“Of all the things that are beyond my power, I value nothing more highly than to be allowed the honor of entering into bonds of friendship with people who sincerely love truth.” (Baruch Spinoza, 1632--1677)
I don’t much
talk about him with friends or family. I would just bore them. But here in the
obscurity of this blog, I can write about Spinoza, a philosopher who fascinates
me.
With the
expulsion of Jews from Portugal, Spinoza’s family settled in the comparatively welcoming
city of Amsterdam. There they became moderately successful merchants. Spinoza was raised with a traditional Jewish
education. However, after the death of
his father, Spinoza expressed doubts about Jewish teachings and was
subsequently excommunicated. Rather than
seek forgiveness or repent, Spinoza turned his back on those who exiled him,
and changed his Hebrew first-name ‘Baruch’ to the Latin ‘Benedictus’. However, Spinoza was never baptized and never
converted. He lived a relatively modest
life, unmarried, supporting himself as a lens-grinder, at the same time doing
the philosophic work that would place him amongst the greatest of all Western minds.
In
historical context, Spinoza lived at a time where many Jews were caught in the
mass hysteria surrounding the false messiah Shabtai Zvi. Spinoza went the opposite route. He wanted to
free religion from religious dogma that preyed upon fear and superstition. For Spinoza,
contemplation and reason was the pathway to God. Spinoza also believed that
contemplation and reason was the pathway to joy, and that the greatest joy comes
from the contemplation and understanding of God.
Spinoza’s god,
what came to be called the god of the philosophers, is wholly immanent and
never transcendent. That is to say, God exists within all of nature, but God
does not exist apart from nature. God
has no personal identity, nor does God govern or intervene in a personal
manner. Spinoza’s god is indifferent,
neither a dispenser of justice nor mercy.
“He who loves God cannot endeavor that God should love him in return.”
Spinoza was
an early modern thinker. He was an advocate for religious tolerance, especially
freedom of thought and opinion. He was among the first to question the
inerrancy of the bible, speculating that it had been written over time by multiple
authors.
Spinoza’s ideas
were consistent with later developments in science and psychology, refuting
Cartesian dualism, while emphasizing mind/brain unity. He wrote extensively about the emotions in
order to understand and master them through reason, a foreshadowing of modern
CBT.
I am
fascinated by Spinoza and yet I find significant shortcomings in his
philosophy. He advocates for calm reason, but where in his philosophy is there a
place for fervor and passion? He most
values thought and contemplation, but what of action and deed? He believes that there is a reason for
everything, but where in his philosophy is there Mystery? He believes that every effect must have its preceding
cause and is a strict determinist. Yet, what of free will?
For all of
my misgivings, Spinoza still has an attractive message regarding how to live .
. . put energy into contemplating life, not death, and seek that which brings
joy to life. “The proper study of a
wise man is not how to die but how to live.” And whatever my misgivings, I enjoy glimpses
of Spinoza’s biting wit. “Surely human affairs would be far happier if the
power in men to be silent were the same as that to speak.” Funny and true.
No comments:
Post a Comment